Experience — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews) 662

In Category - Historical Psychological Social Fiction

Authors: Cotton, Catherine (Catherine M.) Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2015 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Women -- Fiction; World War, 1914-1918 -- England -- Fiction Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 75,305

Reading time 328 min

Text sections 11

This digital edition of Experience — A Closer Reading is described by source-level measurements including 75,305 words, 5 hr 28 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 17.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Women -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #49400

An editorial note examining Catherine Cotton's authorial choices in 'Experience', focusing on the narrator's distinctive voice, the use of humorous dialogue and character sketches, and the detailed, sensory descriptions of domestic spaces, as evidenced in the provided excerpts.

Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg49400

Read the Text

my handkerchief box for a pencil when Nannie came in with a ream of sermon paper and a quart bottle of ink, followed by a procession of servants bearing the _New English Dictionary_ as far as the letter T, which Daddy thought might be useful. In the course of the next hour Ross sent up a wet towel and a can marked ’Midnight Oil,’ and a note arrived from Uncle Jasper to say that he had omitted to mention that it was better ’to resolutely avoid’ split infinitives (whatever they are), and that if I felt bound at times to write of things I didn’t know, it was quite a good tip to shove in a quotation from the best authority on the subject, and that his library was at my disposal at any time. He said, too, that he had a spare copy of the _Record Interpreter_, if it would be of any use.

My uncle’s jokes are like that; no ordinary person can see them at all.

But two can play at ’pulling legs,’ so I sewed up the legs of my brother’s pyjamas, put the wet towel and the can of oil in his bed, and the dictionary in father’s, and, having poured the quart of ink in their two water-jugs, I sat down with great contentment to fulfil my life’s ambition.

I thought over the subjects on which my knowledge was irrefutable, but a novel inspired by any one of them seemed impossible, and by 10.30 p.m. I was suffering from bad brain fag. Then Nannie came in to brush my hair, so I confided my troubles to her, as I always do.

’I seem to be a most ignorant person, Nannie; the only thing I really know about is the family.’

’Well, write a book about that, dearie, I’m sure it’s mad enough.’

’But then there wouldn’t be a plot.’

’No more there is in most people’s lives, not the women’s, anyway.’

’Has your life been very dull, darling?’ I asked.

’My life,’ said Nannie solemnly, ’has been one large hole with bits of stocking round that I have had to try and draw together.’

When Ross came up his remarks about his bed were of so sulphurous a character that I swear I could almost see the brimstone blowing under my door. And in the silent watches of the night I decided that my book _shall_ be about the family, from the time it was born to the day it was buried. Surely something in the nature of a plot will turn up in between.

To begin at the beginning. When I was waiting to be born I must have run up to God and said,—

’Please, _could_ this little boy come, too?’

And perhaps He laughed and answered,—

’Oh, certainly, Miss Fotheringham, as you make such a point of it,’ for Ross and I are twins, and we have lived all our life in this little Devonshire village that is tucked into a hollow in the hills. Daddy is the parson here and Uncle Jasper the lord of the manor. But this place is not ’clear cut,’ as Uncle Jasper says my ’background’ ought to be. It is just a soft jumble of ferns and flowers, of misty mornings and high hedges, of sunshine, of shadows and sweet scents, of hills and dales, of all the countless things that go to make the village so lovely and so baffling.

I think Devonshire is like a beautiful but elusive woman. You think you know her very well, you walk about her lanes and woods, but when you think to capture her soul she ripples away from you in one of her little rushing torrents, just as a woman escapes from the lover who thought he had almost caught and kissed her!

This old-world Vicarage stands in a large and fragrant garden opposite the entrance to the park. If you walk through the great gates and up the long avenue you come to the Elizabethan manor house where my aunt and uncle live with their son, Eustace, and all the family retainers.

Oh! and they are a priceless couple. He isn’t interested in anything ’later’ than the Middle Ages, she in nothing ’earlier’ than Heaven. But their lives are most harmonious, and together they ’wallow in old churches,’ he absorbed in aumbries and piscinas, she in the prayer and praise part. Then, perhaps, he’ll call her,—

’Constance, look at this floating cusp!’

Continue Reading →

From its opening pages, Catherine Cotton's Experience establishes a narrator who is both self-aware and playful. The protagonist, Meg, announces her intention to write a book at seventeen, prompting her brother Ross to exclaim 'Jerubbesheth!'—a characteristic blend of biblical allusion and comic exasperation that sets the tone for the novel's dialogue. Cotton's prose is marked by a lightness of touch, even when describing the mundane details of house-hunting or family banter.

The Narrator's Voice: Wit and Self-Deprecation

The narrator's voice is the novel's chief engine. Meg describes herself as a 'happy, witty, simple-minded woman' in the preface, and the excerpts bear this out. Her observations are laced with gentle irony: she notes that her brother Ross inquires 'with his beautiful natural courtesy' whether a friend is 'endeavouring to qualify for entrance into the County Asylum.' The humour is understated, relying on the gap between polite phrasing and absurd content. Cotton avoids direct commentary, letting the juxtaposition of words and actions create comedy.

Meg's self-deprecation is also evident. When she declares her plan to write a book, Ross's horror is rendered as 'Jerubbesheth!'—a word that deflates her ambition without malice. The narrator does not defend herself; she simply reports the exchange, trusting the reader to see the affection beneath the mockery. This restraint is a deliberate authorial choice, keeping the tone light even when the subject is serious.

Dialogue as Character Revelation

Cotton uses dialogue to reveal character without exposition. The builder Jones, for instance, asks Meg if she has 'any relations in the Isle of Man' because his wife 'was a Miss Ross' and he sees 'Uncle John' in her brother. The non sequitur—linking a surname to a face—is both endearing and absurd. Meg's internal reaction ('How delightful these unexpected relationships are') shows her amusement without condescension.

Similarly, Charlie Foxhill's remark that his mother is 'still steeped in saints' conveys his family's religiosity in a single phrase. His subsequent explanation that he has 'mugged up patent manures and the lost ten tribes' to impress a prospective father-in-law is a comic compression of anxiety and intellectual pretension. Cotton does not explain these jokes; she lets the dialogue stand, trusting the reader to catch the irony.

Description of Place: The Cottage as a Character

The description of the cottage is the most sustained set piece in the excerpts. Cotton piles up sensory details: 'half-timbered and pargetted, with splendid beams and diamond-leaded windows, and roses and honeysuckle everywhere.' The garden is 'all on a slope, of course, with little steps here and there to break the levels.' The 'of course' is a knowing nod to the idealised English cottage, but the specificity—'a little copse with bluebells; already the exciting green spikes are showing'—anchors it in observation.

Meg's excitement is conveyed through breathless syntax: 'such a garden!—all on a slope... flowers, strawberries, and vegetables all mixed up.' The exclamation marks and dashes mimic the rush of enthusiasm. Cotton also includes practical details—the pump in the 'potato shed,' the need for distempering—that prevent the description from becoming mere fantasy. The cottage is both a dream and a fixer-upper, a balance that keeps the narrative grounded.

Structural Choices: Epistolary and Chronological Gaps

The excerpts suggest a hybrid structure. The opening chapter is a first-person narrative, but later sections shift to letters—Meg writes to Michael about the cottage. This epistolary mode allows Cotton to vary pace and perspective. The letter format also justifies the accumulation of detail: Meg can list the surveyor's verdict, the builder's estimate, and the pump's location without straining plausibility.

Cotton also uses temporal ellipses. The preface mentions that the book 'does not aspire to the dignity of a novel' but is 'just a story—an April mixture of sun and shadow.' The excerpts bear this out: scenes are linked by association rather than causal plot. The birthday lunch, the house-hunting, and Charlie's visit are discrete episodes, each self-contained. This episodic structure reinforces the preface's claim that the book lacks a conventional plot, focusing instead on the texture of daily life.

Readers approaching Experience should attend to Cotton's deliberate lightness. The novel's humour depends on precise word choice and timing, not on broad comedy. The narrator's voice is consistent but not monotonous; her letters and dialogue reveal different facets of her personality. The episodic structure rewards patience: each scene is a vignette that contributes to a cumulative portrait of a woman who 'attracted love because she gave it out.' The pleasure lies in the details, not in narrative momentum.

Reading about Cotton’s narrator—her unhurried way of lingering over a room’s light or the tilt of a voice—made me think of how rarely we get that anymore. It’s a particular tenderness, noticing smallness on purpose. I felt the same quiet pull turning through Miss Fairfax of Virginia: A Romance of Love and Adventure Under the Palmettos — Story, Setting & Ideas, as if both writers trusted the hush between words to say what mattered.